Tom Roberts: painting a modern Australia
A foundational figure
Tom Roberts helped transform Australian painting in the late nineteenth century. He is remembered for sunlit landscapes and large narrative scenes of rural labour, but his achievement is broader: he was a portrait painter, organiser, teacher, advocate and energetic connector between artists. Roberts brought lessons from European art back to Melbourne and tested them against local light, social life and geography. His work contributed to a visual culture that was becoming self-conscious in the years before and after Australian Federation.
From Dorchester to Melbourne
Thomas William Roberts was born in Dorchester, England, in 1856. His family migrated to Melbourne in 1869, when he was thirteen. As a young man he worked as a photographer’s assistant while studying at the National Gallery School. The combination mattered. Photography trained him to observe pose, lighting and the economy of a framed image, while formal classes supplied drawing and painting disciplines. Melbourne offered a growing artistic public, but ambitious students still looked to Europe for advanced training.
London and European travel
Roberts returned to Britain in 1881 and studied at the Royal Academy Schools. During journeys on the continent he encountered new approaches to outdoor painting. A meeting with Spanish artists Ramon Casas and Laureà Barrau introduced him to a brighter palette and direct observation. He did not simply import French Impressionism as a finished style. What he carried back to Australia was a set of working methods: painting rapidly before a motif, attending to changing atmosphere, cropping a scene unexpectedly and treating ordinary contemporary life as a serious subject.
{{image:inline-1}}Artists painting together
After returning to Melbourne in 1885, Roberts worked with Frederick McCubbin, Arthur Streeton and Charles Conder at sites including Box Hill, Mentone, Eaglemont and Heidelberg. Their outdoor camps created a practical community. Artists could compare canvases, discuss colour and composition, and respond to the same weather and terrain. The later label “Heidelberg School” describes this network, though its members did not all paint alike.
Roberts was particularly important as an organiser. He encouraged younger colleagues, introduced contacts and helped exhibitions happen. His leadership was not separate from painting: the shared practice of looking and debating shaped the works themselves. Australian Impressionism emerged through collaboration as much as individual inspiration.
The 9 by 5 Impression Exhibition
In 1889 Roberts helped organise the famous 9 by 5 Impression Exhibition in Melbourne. Many works were painted on small wooden cigar-box lids, approximately nine by five inches. The format encouraged speed, portability and experiment. Viewers encountered fleeting urban and landscape impressions rather than conventionally finished academic pictures.
The exhibition was also an argument about modern viewing. A passing tram, evening light, a figure in the street or a strip of coastline could carry artistic value. The small scale asked the spectator to come close, while the visible touch of the brush preserved the immediacy of observation. Critical hostility only reinforced the sense that a new local art was announcing itself.
Light, distance and the Australian landscape
Roberts’s landscapes do not rely on a single formula. Some are intimate and tonal; others use bright dry light and long recession. Trees, tracks and fences organise depth without turning the land into a theatrical backdrop. Human presence is often modest but decisive. A figure or animal supplies scale and reminds us that the landscape is also a place of work, travel and settlement.
Modern viewers should notice the historical frame around these pictures. The pastoral scenes were painted within a settler-colonial society whose claims to land were contested and whose visual culture often excluded Aboriginal perspectives. Admiring Roberts’s formal invention does not require treating his national imagery as neutral. The paintings show both what late nineteenth-century audiences wished to recognise as Australia and what that narrative left outside the frame.
“Shearing the Rams”
Shearing the Rams, developed from studies made at Brocklesby station in New South Wales, is one of Roberts’s best-known works. The crowded shed becomes a stage for concentrated labour. Repeated bent bodies create rhythm, while shafts of light and suspended dust give the interior atmosphere. The scene is monumental without relying on military or classical history. Manual work becomes the subject of a large public painting.
The picture’s construction is highly deliberate. Roberts observed the shearing process closely, but he reorganised it for clarity and force. The apparent naturalism is therefore not a simple record. It is a crafted image of productivity, skill and collective effort, aligned with the search for national subjects before Federation.
{{image:inline-2}}“A Break Away!”
In A Break Away! a rider tries to turn a flock rushing toward water. Heat, dust and diagonal movement dominate the scene. The horizon offers no calm release: the landscape and animals press forward together. Roberts transforms rural work into a drama of speed and control.
The painting also reveals his command of scale. Individual sheep merge into a moving mass, yet the mounted figure remains legible as the point of action. Broad handling in the dust and ground contrasts with sharper accents on rider and horse. The viewer senses both a specific incident and a larger struggle between human organisation and environmental force.
Portraits and the modern sitter
Portraiture provided much of Roberts’s income and forms a major part of his oeuvre. He painted politicians, musicians, artists, women, children and workers. His best portraits avoid a fixed division between official and intimate. Costume and posture identify a social role, while light and facial expression create psychological presence.
The background is often restrained, allowing the sitter to occupy the space directly. Roberts’s photographic experience may have sharpened his awareness of silhouette and pose, but his paint remains active. Flesh, fabric and hair are built with different kinds of touch. A portrait is not merely a likeness; it is an encounter negotiated between sitter, artist and intended audience.
Aboriginal sitters and historical questions
Roberts painted portraits of Aboriginal people, including the work commonly identified as Aboriginal Head, Charlie Turner. These pictures require careful viewing. They preserve individual faces within a period when Aboriginal people were routinely reduced to types in colonial imagery, yet titles, exhibition histories and conditions of commissioning may still reflect unequal relations.
Contemporary interpretation should therefore ask both formal and archival questions. Who was the sitter? How was the work titled at different moments? For whom was it painted, and how did institutions classify it? Such questions do not cancel the portrait; they restore historical complexity to the act of looking.
Federation and the “Big Picture”
Roberts received a commission to paint the opening of the first Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia in Melbourne on 9 May 1901. The resulting canvas, popularly called the “Big Picture,” contains hundreds of portraits and required immense organisational labour. He prepared studies, negotiated access and arranged a vast ceremonial scene while preserving enough individual likenesses to satisfy its documentary purpose.
The painting represents the strengths and limits of official history. It records a foundational political event with extraordinary ambition, but its crowded field also embodies the hierarchies of the ceremony. Roberts’s achievement lies partly in making institutional space visually coherent without erasing the sense of overwhelming scale.
Years in Britain and return
Roberts moved to England in 1903 after completing the parliamentary commission. The career he hoped to establish there developed unevenly. During the First World War he worked as an orderly at the Third London General Hospital, understating his age to serve. He returned permanently to Australia in 1923 and settled at Kallista in the Dandenong Ranges. In his later years he painted smaller landscapes and flower studies, subjects that allowed a quieter attention to colour and atmosphere.
Etching and other media
Although known primarily as a painter, Roberts also made etchings and a small number of sculptures. Printmaking suited his interest in concise tonal structure. An etched line must carry light, depth and movement with fewer means than an oil painting. These works show that the experimental spirit associated with the 9 by 5 panels extended beyond one format.
How to look at Roberts
Begin with the relation between scale and subject. Why does a shearing shed occupy the dimensions once reserved for history painting, while a city impression fits on a cigar-box lid? Then follow the light: does it describe atmosphere, isolate a face or dissolve detail? Finally, consider the viewer’s position. Roberts often places us close enough to feel present but far enough to read the scene as a social arrangement.
In the rural narratives, it is useful to separate observation from ideology. Specific gestures and tools come from study, while the overall composition turns labour into a national image. In portraits, compare public attributes with private expression. Roberts is most interesting where these layers do not coincide perfectly.
Legacy
Roberts influenced Australian art through pictures and through artistic infrastructure. He promoted plein-air practice, organised exhibitions, mentored colleagues and argued for institutions, including a national portrait collection. Later painters inherited not a single style but a model of professional engagement: observe closely, work collectively, and build a public for new art.
His reputation has changed as Australian museums reassess nationalism and colonial history. The celebrated paintings remain technically and historically important, yet they are now read alongside the voices and absences within the society that produced them. This broader context makes Roberts more, not less, significant: his art becomes evidence of how a modern nation pictured itself.
Sources and images
Biographical and collection information was checked against the National Gallery of Australia, the National Portrait Gallery, the National Gallery of Victoria and the National Museum of Australia. Images are reproduced from Wikimedia Commons pages that identify the works as public domain.